|
Post by Burnage on Apr 24, 2009 0:16:32 GMT -5
Actually, thinking about it, it might be best to keep Egos alive and for me to try and direct his kill. We know that the leader role gets reassigned on death, so all killing him will achieve is a vig running around that we don't know about. Once we kill the rest of his faction, we can off him.
|
|
|
Post by kidpresentable on Apr 24, 2009 12:04:06 GMT -5
Kid Presentable wrote: I heard that we can trade our candelabras, is this true? If so, what are the mechanics of this. Is it effective immediately? Next day? How do we actually do it?
CJ Iwakura wrote: Inform me of whom you wish to give your Candelabra to, and the trade is effective immediately. Any abilities you had become theirs.
So, there we go. If we need to give somebody my passive immunity, it can be easily done.
|
|
|
Post by kidpresentable on Apr 24, 2009 12:04:57 GMT -5
Also, I don't know how to play any of this in the main thread. Should I just pretend I'm neutral? I mean, I don't have to come out and say it, but if I have to defend our current cause I guess that's the only way to approach it. Rather have people say "so he's probably neutral" than have them say "he's probably destruction".
|
|
|
Post by matrijs on Apr 24, 2009 12:10:46 GMT -5
Also, I don't know how to play any of this in the main thread. Should I just pretend I'm neutral? I mean, I don't have to come out and say it, but if I have to defend our current cause I guess that's the only way to approach it. Rather have people say "so he's probably neutral" than have them say "he's probably destruction". We're still very vulnerable to both vigs and the vote. Keeping our Destructionness secret is important.
|
|
|
Post by matrijs on Apr 24, 2009 12:13:09 GMT -5
Kid Presentable wrote: I heard that we can trade our candelabras, is this true? If so, what are the mechanics of this. Is it effective immediately? Next day? How do we actually do it? CJ Iwakura wrote: Inform me of whom you wish to give your Candelabra to, and the trade is effective immediately. Any abilities you had become theirs. So, there we go. If we need to give somebody my passive immunity, it can be easily done. If B:L isn't the vote-target, he should probably receive passive immunity, because he's almost certain to be vigged by somebody.
|
|
|
Post by Burnage on Apr 24, 2009 12:58:26 GMT -5
Yeah, nobody should out themselves as being Destruction. I'm skirting dangerously close to appearing as if I'm part of it, and when we res Variable tonight he'll be outed as well. Three public members is not ideal, but let's work with what we have.
Also, something interesting about the kill list last night. Kime's name appeared in white, but his faction alignment was in Musubi's colour. I guess that means he was a convert.
|
|
|
Post by matrijs on Apr 24, 2009 13:08:04 GMT -5
B:L, did you actually get any PMs from anybody? I'm beginning to wonder if there really are all that many unaligned neutrals left.
|
|
|
Post by Barely:Legible on Apr 24, 2009 13:12:46 GMT -5
B:L, did you actually get any PMs from anybody? I'm beginning to wonder if there really are all that many unaligned neutrals left. None at all. Edit: Except Lonely telling me to look for Barong and Cinders asking about Barong.
|
|
|
Post by Burnage on Apr 24, 2009 13:17:24 GMT -5
I don't think there have been many conversions. Nobody wants to pick a side just yet.
|
|
|
Post by matrijs on Apr 24, 2009 13:38:05 GMT -5
OK, let's think this through. We want to keep the res candelabra safe. Who has aroused the least suspicion? B:L is almost certainly going to either be voted out or vigged, so we shouldn't give it to him. Burnage is a little high-profile, and has somebody promising to guard him, which is scary. I've been voted for on at least two different days, so I guess I must be acting somewhat suspicious. Maybe KidPresentable should get it?
|
|
|
Post by Barely:Legible on Apr 24, 2009 13:41:26 GMT -5
Who are we vigging tonight anyways?
|
|
|
Post by matrijs on Apr 24, 2009 13:43:16 GMT -5
Well, there's no need to be subtle anymore. Let's kill whoever most strongly and vocally opposes our point of view. Aside from Nocturne, obviously.
|
|
|
Post by matrijs on Apr 24, 2009 13:46:04 GMT -5
Yo, B:L, they seem to think that you're gonna come back to life immediately. It might be a good idea to make sure that they understand that we're ressing Variable.
|
|
|
Post by Barely:Legible on Apr 24, 2009 13:58:41 GMT -5
What's the best reasoning for voting out Nocturne?
That he guarded himself doesn't seem strong enough.
|
|
|
Post by matrijs on Apr 24, 2009 14:01:48 GMT -5
What's the best reasoning for voting out Nocturne? That he guarded himself doesn't seem strong enough. He's obviously a powerful faction member (otherwise he would be trying to get in with us), and he lied to the neutrals about whether or not they could join Destruction and win.
|
|